Dental hygienist dating patient

Rated 4.51/5 based on 893 customer reviews

Content Header .feed_item_answer_user.js-wf-loaded . Say you live in Washington State, and you find yourself getting to know and becoming attracted to your dental hygienist — or for that matter your optician (that's the person who fits your eyeglasses, based on the prescription provided by your optometrist). Let's see how some new Washington regulations treat this. Under Washington Administrative Code 246-16-020, your dental hygienist and your optician are "health care providers." This means that, under Washington Administrative Code 246-16-100, they "shall not engage, or attempt to engage, in sexual misconduct with a current patient." Sexual misconduct "includes but is not limited to" sex, kissing, "[h]ugging ... nature," "[s]uggesting or discussing the possibility of a dating, sexual or romantic relationship after the professional relationship ends," "[t]erminating a professional relationship for the purpose of dating or pursuing a romantic or sexual relationship," or "[m]aking statements regarding the patient['s] ...I've noticed that this applies to regulators as well as prosecutors (and regulators have the added advantage of being "experts", as well as being the self-defined good guys).All of this is a long-winded way of asking whether perhaps the regulatory authorities in practice choose not to go after a good many violations of these rules which come to their attention, if the relationships at issue meet with their approval.So two years after switching dental hygienists or opticians, you can call up the person and say, "Hey, remember me, from two years ago?I only stopped coming to your office so that I could wait two years and then ask you out. " At that point, they can start a relationship with you — or say, "oh, sorry you had to stay away for two years, but I don't think it would work out between us." 4.The optician may well have more influence and opportunity than you do.He may not have nearly enough to threaten you or coerce you, but that's not the test; the question is just whether there's "an imbalance of ...

dental hygienist dating patient-14

dental hygienist dating patient-18

dental hygienist dating patient-54

.pass_color_to_child_links a.u-inline.u-margin-left--xs.u-margin-right--sm.u-padding-left--xs.u-padding-right--xs.u-absolute.u-absolute--center.u-width--100.u-flex-align-self--center.u-flex-justify--between.u-serif-font-main--regular.js-wf-loaded .u-serif-font-main--regular.amp-page .u-serif-font-main--regular.u-border-radius--ellipse.u-hover-bg--black-transparent.web_page .u-hover-bg--black-transparent:hover. Or, to be precise, you can kiss them, and they can kiss you back — if they are willing to risk professional discipline and possibly loss of their livelihood, a pretty serious burden. But wait; maybe before you leave them and wait the two years, you ought to get a sense of whether they're even interested, no?Except that even if you ask whether they're potentially interested, their answer has to be: Of course, this restriction does end two years after the professional relationship ends.If on the contrary there is not such right, then the Washington legislature can issue whatever restrictions that they deem appropiate on people marrying, as long as there is ANY rational argument for it.I'm surprised you didn't comment more on the bit about no comments about patient's appearance.

Leave a Reply