Disbaled dating dating in nova scotia
I believe that the reasoning that we have to have non-actionable controls in the tab-ring comes from a fundamental misunderstanding of how screen reading software functions.Far too often I have seen test scripts that call for the tester to fail anything that cannot be discovered by tabbing.suggest following platform interaction conventions is the right thing to do.-- Regards Steve F Current Standards Work @W3C Subject: Re: [Web AIM] Should disabled elements receive tab focus I differ.If I can tab to something then the assumption is that I can do something with it.If I am reading through the interface I can see all of the disabled controls and all of the static/informational content and I can also discover all of the actionable controls.If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
If the control is on-screen it should be readable with a minimum level of contrast by all users so they can make the determination of what to do or not do in the form.
From: Steve Faulkner Date: Fri, Oct 28 2016 AM Subject: Re: Should disabled elements receive tab focus ← Previous message | Next message → On 28 October 2016 at , Moore, Michael (Accessibility) (HHSC) How does keeping non-actionable controls out of the tab order present a more accurate description of the interface in its present state?
There are a few instances where it could be useful.
From: Mallory Date: Fri, Oct 28 2016 AM Subject: Re: Should disabled elements receive tab focus ← Previous message | Next message → Disabled controls are not in the tab list.
Someone suddenly breaking that pattern in one place would be extremely confusing. If you let me focus on it, then it had better well Do Something when I click it.